CO129-033 - General Stavely - Lieut. Governor - 1850 [5-8] — Page 301

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

it was sale, having so property in the Colony, might quit it, leaving the Government without means of enforcing its just claim.

16.

any

Your Lordships will observe that Messrs Stuart and Davidson, (Despatch A218), recommend the entire abolition of the present Ground Rent, and that some system of assessment be substituted. The opinion of these gentlemen is entitled to much weight, from their intelligence and honesty of purpose, and I have in consequence given every consideration in my power; but I confess I cannot recommend that their plan should be adopted. My reasons for disagreeing with them are much the same as those advanced by Messrs Meever and Smith, but I am principally opposed to their plan, because it appears to me that it would bear most unfairly on those who have improved their lots, and would also render an inquisitive interference in the affairs of Chinese settlers absolutely necessary. This could only take place through the instrumentality of a numerous and unscrupulous crew of Native Police Officers, and would in the end, I am satisfied, do little to relieve those settlers from the taxation at present liable.

17.

In conclusion, I must remark that the sentiments I have expressed in this Despatch are at variance with those I have advanced in former ones on the subject. To this I can only observe that what I then wrote I believed to be the case, but that a further residence in the Colony and a more intimate knowledge of its real state, together with the circumstance that so few claims have been made for a reduction in the land rents, although all feasible means have been resorted to, to induce persons fancying themselves aggrieved to come forward - have

Edit History

2026-05-17 17:06:13 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
it was sale, having so property in the Colony, might quit it, leaving the Government without means of enforcing its just claim. 16. any Your Lordships will observe that Messrs Stuart and Davidson, (Despatch A218), recommend the entire abolition of the present Ground Rent, and that some system of assessment be substituted. The opinion of these gentlemen is entitled to much weight, from their intelligence and honesty of purpose, and I have in consequence given every consideration in my power; but I confess I cannot recommend that their plan should be adopted. My reasons for disagreeing with them are much the same as those advanced by Messrs Meever and Smith, but I am principally opposed to their plan, because it appears to me that it would bear most unfairly on those who have improved their lots, and would also render an inquisitive interference in the affairs of Chinese settlers absolutely necessary. This could only take place through the instrumentality of a numerous and unscrupulous crew of Native Police Officers, and would in the end, I am satisfied, do little to relieve those settlers from the taxation at present liable. 17. In conclusion, I must remark that the sentiments I have expressed in this Despatch are at variance with those I have advanced in former ones on the subject. To this I can only observe that what I then wrote I believed to be the case, but that a further residence in the Colony and a more intimate knowledge of its real state, together with the circumstance that so few claims have been made for a reduction in the land rents, although all feasible means have been resorted to, to induce persons fancying themselves aggrieved to come forward - have
Baseline (Original)
it was selle, having so property in the Colony, might quit it, leaving the Government withouts means of enforcing its just claim. 16. any Your Lordships with observe that Meere Stuart and Davidson, (huelozure A218), recommend the entire abolition of the present- ground Rent, and that Lone system of : assessment be substituted._. The opinion of gentlemen is entitled to much weight. from their inte these 5. every recount, from intelligence and nonesty of purpose, and I have in consequence suggestion every consideration in confess I cannot recommend given their my power; but I confere - that their plan should be adopted. My reasons for disagreeing with them are much the came as there advanced by Mesert Meveer and Smith, but. I am principally opposed to their plan, because it appears most unfairly to Mue that it would bear on those who have improved_ their lots, and would also render an 295 the inquisitive interference in the affairs of Chinese settlers absolutely necessary. This could 21 only take place through the instrumentality of a renal and emust crew of -Native Police Officer, and would in the end, I am satisfied, do little to relieve those settlers to which they 17. Jann are from the tayation at present liable. In conclusion, I muet, semwork that the sentiments I have expressed MUL MVTAC in this are at variance with those Despatch are at I have advanced in former ones on the subjects. To this I can only observe that; what I then wrote I believed to be the case, but that a further residence in the Colony and a more intimate Knowledge of its real state, together with the circumstance that so few claims have been made for a reduction in the land rents, although all feasible means have been resorted to, to induce persons faneying themselves aggrieved to come forward- have -
2026-05-17 17:06:13 · Baseline
View content

it was selle, having so property in the Colony, might quit it, leaving the Government withouts means of enforcing its just claim.

16.

any

Your Lordships with observe that Meere

Stuart and Davidson, (huelozure A218),

recommend the entire abolition of the present- ground Rent, and that

Lone

system of

: assessment be substituted._. The opinion of

gentlemen is entitled to much weight.

from their inte

these

5. every

recount, from

intelligence and

nonesty of purpose, and I have in consequence suggestion every consideration in

confess I cannot recommend

given

their

my power; but I confere

- that their plan should be adopted. My reasons for disagreeing with them are much the came as there advanced by Mesert Meveer and Smith, but. I am principally opposed to their plan,

because it

appears

most unfairly

to

Mue

that it would bear

on those who have improved_

their lots, and would also render an

295

the

inquisitive interference in the affairs of Chinese settlers absolutely necessary. This could

21

only take place through the instrumentality of a renal and emust crew of -Native Police Officer, and would in the end, I am satisfied, do

little to relieve those settlers

to which they

17.

Jann

are

from

the tayation

at present liable.

In conclusion, I muet, semwork that

the sentiments I have expressed

MUL MVTAC

in this

are at variance with those

Despatch are at

I have advanced in former

ones on the subjects.

To this I can only observe that; what I then wrote I believed to be the case,

but that

a

further residence in the Colony and a more intimate Knowledge of its real state, together with the circumstance that so few claims have been made for a reduction in the land rents, although all feasible

means have been resorted to, to induce persons faneying themselves aggrieved to come forward- have

-

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.